📖 22 mins.

Wengang Cao,1,3 Saif Yacoub,1,3 Kathleen T. Shiverick,2,3 Kazunori Namiki,1,3 Yoshihisa Sakai,1,3 Stacy Porvasnik,1,3 Cydney Urbanek,1,3 and Charles J. Rosser1,2,3*

1 Department of Urology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
2 Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
3 Prostate CancerTranslationalWorking Group, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida

Correspondence: Dr. Charles J. Rosser, MD, Department of Urology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Suite N215, PO Box 100247, Gainesville, FL 3210. E-mail: [email protected]

Received: 28 February 2008
Accepted: 1 April 2008
Published: 8 May 2008


Background: Bcl-2 protects cells from apoptosis and provides a survival advantage to cells over-expressing this oncogene. In addition, over expression of Bcl-2 renders cell resistant to radiation therapy. Recently, dichloroacetate (DCA) was proven to potentiate the apoptotic machinery by interacting with Bcl-2. In this study, we investigated whether treating human prostate cancer cells with DCA could modulate Bcl-2 expression and if the modulation in Bcl-2 expression could render the Bcl-2 over expressing cells more susceptible to cytotoxicity effects of radiation.

Methods: PC-3-Bcl-2 and PC-3-Neo human prostate cancer cells treated with DCA in addition to irradiation were analyzed in vitro for changes in proliferation, clonogenic survival, apoptosis, cell cycle phase distribution, mitochondrial membrane potential, and expression of Bcl-2Bcl-xLBax, or Bak proteins.

Results: DCA alone produced significant cytotoxic effects and was associated with G1 cell cycle arrest. Furthermore, DCA was associated with an increased rate of apoptosis. The combination of DCA with irradiation sensitized both cell lines to radiation’s killing effects. Treatment of PC-3-Bcl-2 or PC-3-Neo with DCA and irradiation resulted in marked changes in various members of the Bcl-2 family. In addition, DCA therapy resulted in a significant change in mitochondria membrane potential, thus supporting the notion that DCAs effect is on the mitochondria.

Conclusions: This is the first study to demonstrate DCA can effectively sensitize wild-type and over expressing Bcl-2 human prostate cancer cells to radiation by modulating the expression of key members of the Bcl-2 family. Together, these findings warrant further evaluation of the combination of DCA and irradiation.

Keywords: dichloracetate; radiation; prostate cancer; Bcl-2

Prostate 68: 1223–1231, 2008.
© 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.


Recurrence after definitive radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer is a common phenomenon occurring in 33–56% of men [1]. Recently, radiation dose escalation has resulted in improved prostate cancer control outcomes [2,3]. Since there is an increased risk of complications in nearby critical structures, the amount of radiation that can be delivered is limited and thus dose escalation is likely not the ultimate solution to overcome radiation resistance. Instead, investigators have turned to strategies for sensitizing prostate tumors to the effects of irradiation [4–7]. However, all such strategies tested over the past 20 years have involved systemic administration of agents whose own unique side effect profiles almost always limit pharmacologic doses to levels below those needed to actually sensitize tumors to irradiation. Moreover, none of the sensitizing strategies tested to date are available for widespread use.

Multiple studies have consistently implicated two genes related to apoptosis, p53 and Bcl-2, as being important in post radiation therapy prostate cancer recurrence [8–13]. Specifically, aberration of these genes can induce faulty mitochondria and apoptotic pathways [14]. Recently, researchers have reported that dichloroacetate (DCA), a known inhibitor of mitochondrial pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase (PDK) and drug utilized for hereditary lactic acidosis disorders, can shift cellular metabolism from glycolysis to glucose oxidation. Cancer cells, and specifically cancer cells known to be resistant to chemotherapy and radiation therapy, are recognized to possess aberrant apoptotic signaling [15]. Researchers have demonstrated that the administration of DCA is associated with correction in glucose utilization and restoration of apoptotic pathways in cancer cells [16]. Thus, we hypothesize that treatment of radiation resistant prostate cancer cells that overexpress Bcl-2 with DCA prior to radiation therapy may restore functional apoptotic function and render the cells more susceptible to the cytotoxic effects of radiation.


Human Prostate Cancer Cell Lines and Reagents
PC-3-Bcl-2 cells (characterized by Bcl-2 overexpression, deleted PTEN, and mutant p53) and PC-3-Neo cells (characterized by wild-type Bcl-2 expression, deleted PTEN, and mutant p53) were generous gifts from Dr. Timothy McDonnell (University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX). The cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium supplement with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 mg/ml streptomycin, 4 mM glutamine, and 400 mg/ml G418. All cells were incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air.

DCA (Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) was dissolved in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) at a concentration of 100 mM. For further experiments, DCA was diluted in PBS, which served as a vehicle control for all experiments. JC-1 dye (5,50 ,6,60 -tetrachloro-1,10 ,3,30 – tetraethyl-benzimidazolylcarbocyanine iodide) (Calbiochem, San Diego) was dissolved in DMSO at a concentration of 2 mg/ml. For further experiments, JC-1 was diluted in culture medium.

InVitro Cytotoxicity Assay PC-3-Bcl-2 and PC-3-Neo were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 2.5 x 103 cells per well and treated with DCA or PBS. Cells were treated with DCA at concentrations ranging from 0.01 mM to 100 mM. After 1–4 days, 100 ml of 1 mg/ml MTT (Sigma–Aldrich) solution was added to appropriate plates and allowed to incubate at 37°C for 2.5 hr. Each reaction was stopped with lysis buffer (200 mg/ml SDS, 50% N,N-dimethylformamide, pH 4) at room temperature for 1 hr, and the optical density was read on a microplate autoreader (Bio-Tek Instruments, Winooski, VT) at 560 nM. Absorbance values were normalized to the values obtained for the control treated cells to determine survival percentage. Each assay was performed in triplicate, and the mean of the three assays was calculated. Cellular viability was confirmed by means of the crystal violet exclusion test.

Clonogenic Survival
Clonogenic survival was assayed using a technique previously employed in our laboratory [17]. Briefly, 5 x 105 PC-3-Bcl-2 or PC-3-Neo prostate cancer cells were plated into sterile T 25 flasks and allowed to attach overnight. The next day, cells were treated with DCA at the concentration that would inhibit the growth of 25% of the cells (IC25) or with PBS (control). Twenty-four hours later, flasks were irradiated with Gamma 40 (0.7 Gy/min) to a total of dose of 2, 4, or 6 Gy or left unirradiated as a control. Immediately after irradiation, cells were trypsinized, serially diluted, replated onto 10-cm dishes, and incubated for 14 days. Next, colonies were stained with 0.2% crystal violet and counted. The surviving fraction (SF) was calculated relative to the unirradiated (control) cells. Each experiment was performed in triplicate, and the mean SF for each set of three experiments was calculated.

Cell Cycle Analysis
For the analysis of cell-cycle distribution, PC-3-Bcl-2 or PC-3-Neo prostate cancer cells were seeded at 5 105 cells in 10-cm tissue culture dishes and incubated overnight. Cells were then treated with DCA at their IC25 or PBS (control) and then maintained in supplemented medium. After 12 hr, some cells were irradiated with 2 Gy. After another 12 hr, cells were trypsinized, washed with 1 PBS, fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde, and stored at 48°C in 70% ethanol. Following incubation in 70% ethanol, cells were treated with RNase A and incubated in propidium iodide solution. Cell-cycle distribution was determined by flow cytometry of at least 10,000 gated cells using FACScan flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ). All cell-cycle analyses were performed in triplicate.

Western Blot Analysis
PC-3-Bcl-2 and PC-3-Neo cells were seeded in 10-cm plates at 4 x 105 cells/well and treated with DCA at the IC25 or PBS (control) for 1 hr; some cells were then irradiated with 2 Gy. After 24 hr, cells were incubated in lysis buffer [250 mM Tris–HCl (pH 6.8), 2% SDS, and 10% glycerol] and protein inhibitor cocktail (Sigma– Aldrich). Then, cells were subjected to a standard protein assay using the DC Protein Assay kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) and Western blot analysis was completed as described previously [18]. Immunoblotting was performed by first incubating the proteins with primary antibodies against Bcl-2, Bcl-xl, total PARP, Bax and g-tubulin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), Bak (BD Pharmingen, San Jose, CA) and then with secondary antibody (Bio-Rad). Protein antibody complexes were detected by means of chemiluminescence (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL).

Membrane Potential Analysis
For the analysis of mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm), PC-3-Bcl-2 or PC-3-Neo prostate cancer cells were seeded at 5 x 105 cells in 10-cm tissue culture dishes and incubated overnight. Cells were then treated with DCA at their IC25 or PBS (control) and then maintained in supplemented medium. After 12 hr, some cells were irradiated with 2 Gy. After another 12 hr, cells were trypsinized, washed with 1 PBS, incubated with medium containing JC-1 dye (10 mg/ml) for 20 min at 37°C. In normal cells, due to the electrochemical potential gradient, the dye concentrates in the mitochondrial matrix, where it forms orange fluorescent aggregates. A reaction that affects the mitochondrial membrane potential prevents the accumulation of the JC-1 dye in the mitochondria and, thus, the dye is dispersed throughout the entire cell leading to a shift from orange to green fluorescence. Lastly, the cells were washed and resuspended in 1 ml PBS for fluorescent flow cytometry analysis using FACScan flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson) measuring at least 10,000 gated cells. Mitochondrial depolarization is indicated by a decrease in orange/green fluorescence ratio. All mitochondrial membrane potential analyses were performed in triplicate.

Statistical Analysis
Differences between experimental groups were analyzed for statistical significance using Student’s t-test. A value of P < 0.05 was considered significant.


Treatment With DCA is Associated With Decrease Rates of Cellular Proliferation and Sensitization to Irradiation
Treatment with increasing concentrations of DCA inhibited the proliferation of PC-3-Bcl-2 and PC-3-Neo cells in a dose dependent manner. The IC25 values of DCA were 1 and 0.5 mM, respectively, for PC-3-Bcl-2 and PC-3-Neo cells (Fig. 1A,B). These results were confirmed by crystal violet exclusion test. The IC25 concentrations determined above for DCA were then used to evaluate possible radiosensitizing effects in a clonogenic survival assay. In four experiments, the clonogenic response of PC-3-Bcl-2 and PC-3-Neo cells was next evaluated after the treatment of DCA or PBS (control) followed by irradiation. Both cell lines were relatively resistant to radiation alone; however, after controlling for plating efficiencies, PC-3-Bcl-2 proved to be more resistant to irradiation. In experiments in which cells were irradiated to a total dose of 2 Gy alone (Control), the surviving fraction (SF) was 75% of PC-3-Bcl-2 compared with 64% of PC-3-Neo cells (Fig. 2). In experiments in which cells were pretreated with DCA and then irradiated to 2 Gy, relatively more PC-3-Bcl-2 cells survived (65%, reduction of 10% compared to no DCA pretreatment, P ¼ 0.02) than did PC-3-Neo cells (27%, reduction of 37% compared to no DCA pretreatment, P ¼ 0.001) (Fig 2A,B). Thus, DCA sensitizes previously radiation resistant cells to the killing effects of irradiation.

Fig. 1. DCA inhibits prostate cancer cell proliferation. PC-3-Bcl-2 and PC-3-Neo cells were treated with DCA (0.01^100mM) or phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)(control). DCA inhibited cellular proliferationinadose-dependentmannerinbothcelllines(&,0.01mM;D,0.1mm;},1mM; ,10 mM; *,100 mM).Ninety-six hours after DCA,10 () and100 (*) mM concentrationsin both PC-3-Bcl-2 and PC-3-Neo cells significantly inhibited cellular proliferation (P < 0.05).The concentrations of DCA that produced 25% inhibition of cell growth (IC25) were calculated to be 1mMin PC-3-Bcl-2 and 0.5mMin PC-3-Neo prostate cancer cells. Shown here are the representative dose-response curves for DCAin each cellline.Each assay wasperformedin triplicatefor two experiments.Resultswere confirmedwith the crystalvioletexclusion test.

Fig. 2. Clonogenic survival of prostate cancer cells treated with DCA and irradiation. PC-3-Bcl-2 (A) and PC-3-Neo (B) prostate cancer cells were treated first with DCA (solid white line) or PBS (control) (solid black line).Twenty-four hours later flaskswereirradiated to a total of 0, 2, 4, or 6 Gy, and then replated for a clonogenic survival assay. Each experiment was performed in triplicate, and the mean SF for all three experimentswascalculated.Errorbarsrepresent SEM.After controlling forplatingefficiencies,PC-3-Bcl-2 cells proved tobemoreradiation resistant than PC-3-Neo cells.TreatmentwithDCA sensitizedbothPC-3-Bcl-2andPc-3-Neo cells to irradiation.*P < 0.05comparedwithPBS (control).

DCA Treatment Affects Cell-Cycle Distribution
When compared with PBS treatment (control), irradiation alone caused a G2M phase arrest in both PC-3-Bcl-2 and PC-3-Neo cells. In comparison, DCA alone produced no significant change in cell cycle in either in PC-3-Bcl-2 or PC-3-Neo cells. Treatment with DCA in combination with irradiation did not produce a significant change in cell-cycle over irradiation alone (Fig. 3A,B).

Fig. 3. Flowcytometric analysis of PC-3-Bcl-2 and PC-3-Neo cells stainedforDNAcontent.Cells were treated with DCA (A,1mMin PC-3- Bcl-2 and B, 0.5 mM in PC-3-Neo) or PBS (control) for 12 hr followed by irradiation with 0 or 2 Gy. Twelve hours later cells were harvested, processed and subjected to flow cytometry. Experiments were performed in triplicate. The figure depicts the results of one experiment. Exposure of PC-3-Bcl-2 and PC-3-Neo cells to DCA was not associated with a significant change in cell cycle distribution while radiation was associated with a significant G2Mblockin both cell lines. (* denotes significant change in phase of cell cycle compared to CTL, where P < 0.05).
Figure 3 (B)

Bcl-2 Family and Apoptotic Marker Are Affected by DCA Treatment
In PC-3-Bcl-2 cells, DCA did not alter Bcl-2 or Bcl-xl expression, whereas irradiation resulted in diminished expression of both Bcl-2 and Bcl-xl. Combination therapy with DCA and irradiation did not reduce expression of Bcl-2 and Bcl-xl. Bak expression was virtually unchanged in PC-3-Bcl-2 cells treated with DCA, radiation or combination. In PC-3-Bcl-2 cells, Bax expression was reduced by DCA treatment; interestingly, combination therapy increased Bax protein levels. Of note, total PARP expression was not changed in cells treated with DCA alone or irradiation alone. Though combinational therapy of DCA and radiation was associated with radiation sensitization as seen on clonogenic assay (Fig. 2) and increased expression of Bax, total PARP level was also increased (Fig. 4). Thus it is feasible that the cells succumbing to irradiation are undergoing a cellular death not associated with apoptosis.

In PC-3-Neo cells, DCA decreased the expression of Bcl-2 and Bcl-xl expression, whereas irradiation resulted in an increase expression of Bcl-2 and Bcl-xl. Compared to radiation alone, combination therapy with DCA and irradiation reduced expression of Bcl-2 and Bcl-xl. Bak expression was slightly increased in PC-3-Neo cells treated with DCA alone, irradiation alone or combination. Bax expression was unchanged in cells treated with DCA alone, and irradiation alone, however in cells treated with both DCA and irradiation, Bax expression was increased. PARP expression was increased in PC-3-Neo cells after exposure to DCA or irradiation; whereas, combination therapy with DCA and irradiation decreased total PARP protein levels, signifying total PARP was undergoing cleavage resulting in apoptosis (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4. Western blot analysis of Bcl-2, Bcl-xl, Bak, Bax, and PARP expression in prostate cancer cell lines treated with DCA. PC-3-Bcl-2 and PC-3-Neo prostate cancer cells were treated with DCA and irradiation (2 Gy) as per Materials and Methods Section. In both cell lines, DCA alone was not associated with changes in Bcl-2 or Bcl-xl expression, while Bak expression was increased in PC-3-Neo. On the other hand, radiation was associated with increased Bcl-2 and up regulated Bax expression in both PC-3-Bcl-2 and PC-3-Neo reduction in total PARP was evidentonlyinPC-3-Neo treated with thecombinationofDCAandirradiation.

DCA Alters Mitochondrial Membrane Potential
Next, we studied mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm) in both PC-3-Bcl-2 and PC-3-Neo prostate cancer cell lines (Fig. 5). PC-3-Bcl-2 cells proved to possess a significantly higher ΔΨm of the two lines (P ¼ 0.009). When compared with PBS treatment (control), DCA alone lowered ΔΨm in both PC-3-Bcl2, P < 0.05. The DCA effects on mitochondrial ΔΨm occurred within 10 min after exposure in both cell lines and were dose dependent (data not shown). In comparison, irradiation alone increased ΔΨm in PC-3-Bcl-2 cells (P ¼ 0.02) whereas irradiation alone decreased ΔΨm in PC-3-Neo cells (P ¼ 0.04). Interestingly combinational therapy of DCA and irradiation was associated with a reduction of ΔΨm compared to irradiation alone in PC-3-Bcl-2 and PC-3-Neo.

Fig. 5. Flow cytometric analysis of changes of mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm) in prostate cancer cells treated with DCA. Cells were treated with DCA or PBS (control) for12 hr followed by irradiation with 0 or 2 Gy. Twelve hours later, cells were subjected to media containing JC-1dye for 20 min at 37°C. Next cells were harvested, washed and suspended in PBS for fluorescent flow cytometry analysis. Experimentswereperformedin triplicate. The figure depicts the results of one experiment. Exposure of PC-3-Bcl-2cells to DCA was associated with a significantreductioninΔΨm compared to CTL. (* denotes significant change in cm compared to CTL, where P < 0.05).


DCA is one of many organohalides to which humans have been chronically exposed. Environmental sources of DCA include chlorinated drinking water [19–21] and groundwater contamination by certain industrial solvents and other chlorinated precursors [22]. Evidence suggests that DCA is a potential health hazard since rodents administered DCA at supratherapeutic concentrations developed hepatotoxicity and neoplasia [23], common side effects of our current chemotherapeutic agents. Interestingly, DCA has been administered orally and parenterally for decades as an investigational drug for the treatment of numerous cardiovascular and metabolic disorders. However, several randomized controlled trials utilizing DCA in adults or children with lactic acidosis either demonstrated no clinical benefit or was stopped early do to significant neurotoxicity [24–26].

The interest of DCA in cancer therapeutics hinges on that fact that cancer cells generally utilize glycolysis rather than oxidation for energy (the Warburg effect) [15]. Glycolysis leads to tumor hypoxia which in turn stimulates a panel of cell survival genes that enable the tumor to grow and thrive [15]. However, limited studies have addressed the usage of DCA in cancer therapeutics. Compared to normal cells, several human cancer cell lines have high ΔΨm and low expression of the K þ channel Kv1.5, both thought to contribute to apoptosis resistance in cancer cells. DCA can inhibit mitochondrial PDK thus shifting metabolism from glycolysis to glucose oxidation which increases mitochondrial H2O2 leading to release of cytochrome c preferentially in cancer cells. Thus, DCA induces apoptosis, decreases proliferation, and inhibits tumor growth, with minimal toxicity. Molecular inhibition of PDK by siRNA strategy produced effects similar to DCA administration [16].

We report here the first study using DCA in combination with irradiation for the treatment of prostate cancer. We demonstrate that both human prostate cancer cells with or without overexpression of Bcl-2,could be rendered sensitive to the killing effects of irradiation by DCA. The molecular mechanism thought to be responsible for this sensitization to radiation is related to the Bcl-2 family. In this regard, the Bcl-2 family can induce (pro-apoptotic members, e.g., Bax, Bak, Bad) or inhibit (anti-apoptotic members, e.g., Bcl-2, Bcl-xl, Mcl-1) the release of cytochrome c into the cytosol, which subsequently activates caspase-9 and caspase-3, leading to apoptosis (programmed cell death) [27,28]. In this study, we demonstrated that the combination of DCA and irradiation led to increase expression of Bax, which in PC-3-Neo cells resulted in increased rates of apoptosis. Lastly to confirm the results of Bonnett and others [16], we demonstrated that DCA resulted in a change in ΔΨm which correlated to the induction of apoptosis in PC-3-Neo prostate cancer cells. Though PC-3-Bcl-2 prostate cancer cells were sensitize to irradiation by DCA, this was not associated with increased rates of apoptosis. Thus we speculate that the Bcl-2 expressing tumor cells may succumb to the effects of radiation by a mechanism other than apoptosis.

Previously our group demonstrated the importance of Bcl-2 overexpression in human prostate cancer cells. Specifically cells that were engineered to overexpress Bcl-2 were more resistant to chemotherapy and to radiation therapy [17,29–31]. However therapy aimed to down regulate Bcl-2 proved to sensitize these cancer cells to these conventional therapies. In addition, human prostatic tumors that overexpressed Bcl-2 were more prone to fail radiation therapy [32]. This concept was definitively addressed when Pollack and others reported that men with high Bcl-2 expression or low Bax expression on prostate biopsies had a lower rates of biochemical disease free survival [33]. Thus the importance of targeting Bcl-2 family is obvious. To date however, limited neoadjuvant chemotherapy or molecular targeted trials have been conducted in humans.

With the recent success of such targeted agents as sorafenib, sunitinib, Bevacizumab, and Imatinib Mesylate in advanced human tumors, it is time to utilize these and similar agents earlier in the disease process. Even with androgen deprivation therapy and external beam radiation therapy, a high risk prostate cancer has a 5-year biochemical failure rate of >30% [34,35]. To further improve survival results, a multimodality approach that combines systemic chemotherapy or targeted therapy with local therapy seems warranted. Such a multimodality approach could take the form of neoadjuvant therapy (i.e., therapy before surgical resection) or adjuvant therapy (i.e., therapy after surgical resection), which over the past several decades has been studied extensively in many types of cancer. Molecular markers may be assessed in tumors treated with neoadjuvant therapies. Future regimens may be formulated based on changes of these molecular parameters.

Radiotherapy is a popular treatment modality for localized prostate cancer. However molecular signatures exist that render the cell radiation resistant. In PC-3 prostate cancer cells, we demonstrated that DCA can significantly reduce cellular proliferation and sensitize cells to the killing effects of radiation. Furthermore, cells not expressing Bcl-2 were demonstrated to undergo marked apoptosis when treated with radiation and DCA. DCA may prove to be a promising selective anticancer agent. Obviously the usage of DCA in cancer therapeutics is still in its infancy and requires methodical preclinical and clinical evaluation.


Support from American Cancer Society student scholar program (S.Y.) is gratefully acknowledged.


DCA, dichloroacetate; PDK, pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase; PBS, phosphate buffered saline; CTL, control; IC25, inhibitor concentration25; Gy, gray; PARP, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase; m, mitochondrial membrane potential.


1 D’Amico, A, D’Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, Schultz D, Blank K, Broderick GA, Tomaszewski JE, Renshaw AA, Kaplan I, Beard CJ, Wein A. Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA 1998;280:969–974.
2 Pollack A, Zagars GK, Starkschall G, Antolak JA, Lee JJ, Huang E, von Eschenbach AC, Kuban DA, Rosen I. Prostate cancer radiation dose response: Results of the M.D. Anderson phase III randomized trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002;53:1097– 1105.
3 Zelefsky MJ, Fuks Z, Wolfe T, Kutcher GJ, Burman C, Ling CC, Venkatraman ES, Leibel SA. Locally advanced prostatic cancer: Long-term toxicity outcome after three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy—A dose-escalation study. Radiology 1998; 209:169–174.
4 Eklo¨v S, Essand M, Carlsson J, Nilsson S. Radiation sensitization by estramustine studies on cultured human prostatic cancer cells. Prostate 1992;21:287–295.
5 Colletier PJ, Ashoori F, Cowen D, Meyn RE, Tofilon P, Meistrich ME, Pollack A. Adenoviral-mediated p53 transgene expression sensitizes both wild-type and null p53 prostate cancer cells in vitro to radiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000;48:1507– 1512.
6 Teimourian S, Jalal R, Sohrabpour M, Goliaei B. Downregulation of Hsp27 radiosensitizes human prostate cancer cells. Int J Urol 2006;13:1221–1225.
7 Rochester MA, Riedemann J, Hellawell GO, Brewster SF, Macaulay VM. Silencing of the IGF1R gene enhances sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents in both PTEN wild-type and mutant human prostate cancer. Cancer Gene Ther 2005;12:90–100.
8 An J, Chervin AS, Nie A, Ducoff HS, Huang Z. Overcoming the radioresistance of prostate cancer cells with a novel Bcl-2 inhibitor. Oncogene 2007;26:652–661.
9 Inayat MS, Chendil D, Mohiuddin M, Elford HL, Gallicchio VS, Ahmed MM. Didox (a novel ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor) overcomes Bcl-2 mediated radiation resistance in prostate cancer cell line PC-3. Cancer Biol Ther 2002;1:539–545.
10 Mackey TJ, Borkowski A, Amin P, Jacobs SC, Kyprianou N. bcl2/bax ratio as a predictive marker for therapeutic response to radiotherapy in patients with prostate cancer. Urology 1998; 52:1085–1090.
11 Rakozy C, Grignon DJ, Sarkar FH, Sakr WA, Littrup P, Forman J. Expression of bcl-2, p53, and p21 in benign and malignant prostatic tissue before and after radiation therapy. Mod Pathol 1998;11:892–899.
12 Grossfeld GD, Olumi AF, Connolly JA, Chew K, Gibney J, Bhargava V, Waldman FM, Carroll PR. Locally recurrent prostate tumors following either radiation therapy or radical prostatectomy have changes in Ki-67 labeling index, p53 and bcl-2 immunoreactivity. J Urol 1998;159:1437–1443.
13 Huang A, Gandour-Edwards R, Rosenthal SA, Siders DB, Deitch AD, White RW. p53 and bcl-2 immunohistochemical alterations in prostate cancer treated with radiation therapy. Urology 1998; 51:346–351.
14 Galluzzi L, Larochette N, Zamzami N, Kroemer G. Mitochondria as therapeutic targets for cancer chemotherapy. Oncogene 2006; 25:4812–4830.
15 Xu R, Pelicano H, Zhou Y, Carew J, Feng L, Bhalla K, Keating M, Huang P. Inhibition of glycolysis in cancer cells: A novel strategy to overcome drug resistance associated with mitochondrial respiratory defect and hypoxia. Cancer Res 2005;65:613–621.
16 Bonnet S, Archer SL, Allalunis-Turner J, Haromy A, Beaulieu C, Thompson R, Lee CT, Lopaschuk GD, Puttagunta L, Bonnet S, Harry G, Hashimoto K, Porter CJ, Andrade MA, Thebaud B, Michelakis ED. A mitochondria-Kþ channel axis is suppressed in cancer and its normalization promotes apoptosis and inhibits cancer growth. Cancer Cell 2007;11:37–51.
17 Rosser CJ, Tanaka M, Pisters LL, Tanaka N, Levy LB, Hoover DC, Grossman HB, McDonnell TJ, Kuban DA, Meyn RE. Adenoviralmediated PTEN transgene expression sensitizes Bcl-2-expressing prostate cancer cells to radiation. Cancer Gene Ther 2004; 11:273–279.
18 Rogelj S, Weinberg RA, Fanning P, Klagsbrun M. Basic fibroblast growth factor fused to a signal peptide transforms cells. Nature 1988;331:173–175.
19 Miller JW, Uden PC. Characterization of nonvolatile aqueous chlorination products of humic substances. Environ Sci Technol 1983;17:150–157.
20 Uden PCC, Miller JW. Chlorinated acids and chloral in drinking water. J Am Water Works Assoc 1983;75:524–527.
21 Mughal FH. Chlorination of drinking water and cancer: A review. J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol 1992;11:287–292.
22 Jolley RL, Basic issues in water chlorination: A chemical perspective. In: Jolly RL. Water chlorination: Chemistry, environmental impact and health effects, Vol. 5. Chelsea, MI: Lewis Publishers; 1985. pp. 19–38.
23 Stacpoole PW, Henderson GN, Yan Z, James MO. Clinical pharmacology and toxicology of dichloroacetate. Environ Health Perspect 1998;106:989–994.
24 Stacpoole P, Kerr D, Barnes C, Bunch S, Carney P, Fennell E, Felitsyn N, Gilmore R, Greer M, Henderson G, Hutson A, Neiberger R, O’Brien R, Perkins L, Quisling R, Shroads A, Shuster J, Silverstein J, Theriaque D, Valenstein E. Controlled clinical trial of dichloroacetate for treatment of congenital lactic acidosis in children. Pediatrics 2006;117:1519–1531.
25 Kaufmann P, Engelstad K, Wei Y, Jhung S, Sano M, Shungu D, Millar W, Hong X, Gooch C, Mao X, Pascual J, Hirano M, Stacpoole P, DiMauro S, De Vivo D. Dichloroacetate causes toxic neuropathy in MELAS: A randomized, controlled clinical trial. Neurology 2006;66:324–330.
26 Stacpoole P, Wright E, Baumgartner T, Bersin R, Buchalter S, Curry S, Duncan C, Harman E, Henderson G, Jenkinson S. A controlled clinical trial of dichloroacetate for treatment of lactic acidosis in adults. The Dichloroacetate-Lactic Acidosis Study Group. N Engl J Med 1992;327:1564–1569.
27 Zamzami N, Brenner C, Marzo I, Susin SA, Kroemer G. Subcellular and submitochondrial mode of action of Bcl-2-like oncoproteins. Oncogene 1998;16:2265–2282.
28 Chao DT, Korsmeyer SJ. BCL-2 family: Regulators of cell death. Annu Rev Immunol 1998;16:395–419.
29 Tanaka M, Rosser CJ, Grossman HB. PTEN gene therapy induces growth inhibition and increases efficacy of chemotherapy in prostate cancer. Cancer Detect Prev 2005;29:170–174.
30 Anai S, Goodison S, Shiverick K, Hirao Y, Brown BD, Rosser CJ. Knock-down of Bcl-2 by antisense oligodeoxynucleotides induces radiosensitization and inhibition of angiogenesis in human PC-3 prostate tumor xenografts. Mol Cancer Ther 2007; 6:101–111.
31 Anai S, Goodison S, Shiverick K, Iczkowski K, Tanaka M, Rosser CJ. Combination of PTEN gene therapy and radiation inhibits the growth of human prostate cancer xenografts. Hum Gene Ther 2006;17:975–984.
32 Rosser CJ, Reyes AO, Vakar-Lopez F, Levy LB, Kuban DA, Hoover DC, Lee AK, Pisters LL. Bcl-2 is significantly overexpressed in localized radio-recurrent prostate carcinoma, compared with localized radio-naive prostate carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003;56:1–6.
33 Pollack A, Cowen D, Troncoso P, Zagars GK, von Eschenbach AC, Meistrich ML, McDonnell T. Molecular markers of outcome after radiotherapy in patients with prostate carcinoma: Ki-67, bcl-2, bax, and bcl-x. Cancer 2003;97:1630–1638.
34 Bolla M, Collette L, Blank L, Warde P, Dubois JB, Mirimanoff RO, Storme G, Bernier J, Kuten A, Sternberg C, Mattelaer J, Lopez Torecilla J, Pfeffer JR, Lino Cutajar C, Zurlo A, Pierart M. Longterm results with immediate androgen suppression and external irradiation in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (an EORTC study): A phase III randomised trial. Lancet 2002;360: 103–106.
35 Lawton CA, Winter K, Murray K, Machtay M, Mesic JB, Hanks GE, Coughlin CT, Pilepich MV. Updated results of the phase III Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) trial85– 31evaluating the potential benefit of androgen suppression following standard radiation therapy for unfavorable prognosis carcinoma of the prostate. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001; 49:937–946.

Related content:

Leave a Reply